AureqoEq · laboratory equipment management

Know what is due and why.

For laboratory managers, quality teams and equipment coordinators. Keep equipment requirements, due work and the supporting records behind equipment status together.

In active development. Explore the current workflow using demonstration data; any pilot is discussed separately.

Turn scattered equipment records into an assurance workflow.

Track equipment, configure calibration, maintenance and service requirements, generate due work, record what happened and connect the evidence that supports a decision. When something fails, the history remains visible through remediation and return-to-service.

Equipment status is evaluated against configured requirements. It does not certify regulatory compliance or replace a laboratory's quality system, accreditation obligations or professional judgement. Calibration execution and uncertainty calculations are outside the current scope.

Inside the assurance record

From equipment register to evidence.

These views follow implemented AureqoEq patterns and use demonstration records only. They are interface illustrations, not a live application session.

01 · Equipment register

Start with what the laboratory has.

Asset identity, location, lifecycle and requirement status stay visible together, with search and filters for the work that needs attention.

02 · Requirement state

Understand why an item is due.

Configured calibration, maintenance and inspection requirements drive due dates and make the current status explainable.

03 · Evidence and history

Keep the proof beside the decision.

Work records, uploaded evidence and approval events remain connected in a timeline that can be reconstructed later.

Product preview

What the current development covers.

AureqoEq is in active development. The areas below reflect the current product direction and implemented workflow surfaces, not a promise of general availability.

Implemented workflow areas

  • Equipment register
  • Calibration, maintenance and service requirements
  • Due work and requirement status
  • Supporting evidence
  • Approval and audit history
  • Issue, quarantine and return-to-service workflow

Validation and scope boundaries

Operational readiness and pilot arrangements remain under validation. Calibration execution, uncertainty calculations, direct calibration-device integration and a full quality-management system are outside the current scope.

From interest to evaluation

A clear next step.
A pilot only if it fits.

A walkthrough starts the conversation. It does not commit your laboratory to a pilot, a subscription or a system change.

  1. Choose one process

    Bring one equipment group and the way you track requirements, due work and supporting records. Describe the problem without sharing confidential laboratory records.

  2. See the current software

    Walk through demonstration data. Compare the product with your process and identify what fits, what is missing and what falls outside its scope.

  3. Assess a scoped pilot

    If there is a useful fit, discuss a paid pilot. Agree the scope, fee, duration, responsibilities and success criteria separately, including any custom build work, before the pilot begins.

Before using laboratory data
Data handling, access, support, recovery and exit arrangements need to be assessed and agreed. Products remain in active development; pilot availability is not guaranteed.

Request a product walkthrough
The core question

Can your team prove the current state?

EQ keeps the answer grounded in configured requirements and recorded evidence, rather than a colour or a spreadsheet cell alone. Review indicative AureqoEq pricing when you are ready to compare scope.

Request a product walkthrough